Friday, September 5, 2008

Pakistan Blind Cricketers Win World Cup

Guest Post by Deeda-i-Beena

Yes, that is correct!

They are Blind. They are Team Pakistan. They too are cricketers. They have made the Finals in three previous showings. Now they have won the World Cup second time running.

The last couple of weeks, venues in Islamabad and Rawalpindi have seen cricket matches played by the Blind for the World Cup. Teams from seven countries participated in this tournament. They were: Australia, England, India, New Zealand, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and West Indies. (See another video news clip here).

This World Cup tournament received scant media coverage (although on winning the World Cup did get them a picture on the front page of Dawn) and even less public knowledge or participation. The opening games were played on the League-basis, followed by semi-finals and the final was played on Saturday December 16th between India and Pakistan.

The Pakistan team lifted the World Cup after beating India by six wickets.

I confess to not knowing much about this genre of cricket. I understand the ball rattles, it is bowled under-hand and the batsmen sweep it across the playground. Otherwise, the scene is unmistakably of a cricket ground and the players every bit look and act like cricketers.

Here are some interesting facts picked from The News which provided good coverage, probably because the Jang Group and Geo TV were among the major sponsors of the event:

  • “Pakistani (Blind) fielders exhibited outstanding work as six Indian batsmen were run out.â€Â? Any such feat or expectation from the sighted team?
  • Pakistan’s entire winning team received Rs. 200,000 as WIN BONUS. All the best players (of the tournament?) in their categories were awarded $200 each. What modest players and team winning the World Cup and settling for a fraction of the sighted team’s largesse.
  • Scores of 360, over 200 etc. were made in several matches.
  • Pakistan set FIVE World Records during a 10 wicket victory against New Zealand team.

We all know what fortunes are made when just one sighted player breaks World Records. Here a blind team set 5 new records and nothing moved in their favour. Is it discrimination against the visually challenged, or what??? One wonders, also, what incentives are provided to our women cricketers?

Deeda-i-Beena is a former graduate teacher, has international experience and background in social, environmental and human developement issues.

1992 Cricket World Cup

Rule changes

The 1991-92 World Cup saw several changes from previous tournaments:

  • the first World Cup to have day/night matches[1]
  • the first World Cup to use white cricket balls and coloured team uniforms[1]
  • A controversial system of recalculating team totals for a reduced number of overs for matches affected by rain was introduced.[1]
  • the first World Cup to feature an African Test nation - South Africa.
  • the first World Cup held in the Southern hemisphere.
  • New techniques were used
    • pinch-hitters (Batsmen sent in the early stages (higher order) to hit the ball over the infield to ensure a good start to the innings)
    • New Zealand opening with spin bowlers to confuse the higher order batsmen who are used to fast bowlers trying to extract speed and bounce with the new ball

The format was changed from the 1987 World Cup to accommodate South Africa. Nine countries participated in the event and, for the first time, the teams were not divided into groups. The first stage involved a complete round-robin and required 36 matches. The top four teams qualified for the semi-finals.

Overview of the tournament

The countries participating were all Test nations, with the exception of Zimbabwe:

  • Australia
  • England
  • India
  • New Zealand
  • Pakistan
  • South Africa
  • Sri Lanka
  • West Indies
  • Zimbabwe


The 1992 World Cup was won by Pakistan, captained by Imran Khan, who beat England by 22 runs in the final at the Melbourne Cricket Ground (MCG), to see the "Cornered tigers" and Imran Khan lift the trophy. Pakistan won just one of their first five matches and only qualified for the semi-finals by beating the previously undefeated New Zealand side in their final round robin game. In one of the games Pakistan looked set to lose with England on 24-1 chasing Pakistan's score of 74 all out, but were saved by a spell of rain, which left the game as a no-result, the sides taking one point each. Without that point Pakistan would not have qualified for the semi-finals. New Zealand and South Africa were the losing semi-finalists.

South Africa's semi-final against England ended in controversial circumstances when, after a rain delay, the rule in use for revising target scores in rain-affected matches revised their target from 22 runs from 13 balls to an impossible 21 runs from one ball. This rule was replaced for One-day International matches in Australia after the World Cup, and it was eventually superseded by the Duckworth-Lewis method for the 1999 World Cup onwards. The revised D/L target for the match would have been four runs to tie or five to win from the final ball. [2]

A notable feature of this World Cup was the innovative tactics employed by New Zealand captain Martin Crowe, who opened his team's bowling with a spin bowler, Dipak Patel, rather than with a fast bowler, as is usual practice. Another innovation was the opening of the New Zealand batting by pinch hitters.

New Zealand lost only two matches in the tournament, a Group match and their Semi-final, both against Pakistan.

ICC Cricket World Cup 1979


Cricket World Cup 1979, also known as the 'Prudential Cup' was the second edition of the series. The host nation was England and the event took place from June 9 to June 23. Total eight teams participated in this mega event who played the preliminary matches in 2 groups of 4 each. The top two teams from each group contested in the semifinals. The winners played the final match.

Then, the matches were played in a traditional fashion. Same white uniforms, red balls and played only during the day-light. The match use to start early and consisted of 60 overs.

West Indies and England played the final at the Lord's cricket ground in London. West Indies won by 92 runs. The Prudential Cup was lifted by the captain of West Indies, Clive Lloyd. This was the second consecutive time the West Indies won the World Cup. The other two semifinalists were New Zealand and Pakistan.

Venue : England
Date : 9 June 1979 to 23 June 1979
Teams Played:
Group A : England, Pakistan, Australia, Canada.
Group B : West Indies, New Zealand, Sri Lanka, India.
Winner: West Indies (Beated England By 92 Runs).
Man of The Match: Vivian Richards - Scored 138 runs.

Summary :-
Group A: Canada v Pakistan - June 9, 1979 at Leeds
Pakistan won by 8 wickets.
Canada 139-9 (60 ov); Pakistan 140-2 (40.1 ov).


Group A: England v Australia - June 9, 1979 at Lord's
England won by 6 wickets.
Australia 159-9 (60 ov); England 160-4 (47.1 ov).

Group B: India v West Indies - June 9, 1979 at Birmingham
West Indies won by 9 wickets.
India 190 (53.1 ov); West Indies 194-1 (51.3 ov).

Group B: New Zealand v Sri Lanka - June 9, 1979 at Nottingham
New Zealand won by 9 wickets.
Sri Lanka 189 (56.5 ov); New Zealand 190-1 (47.4 ov).

Group A: Australia v Pakistan - June 13, 1979 at Nottingham
Pakistan won by 89 runs.
Pakistan 286-7 (60 ov); Australia 197 (57.1 ov).

Group A: England v Canada - June 13, 1979 at Manchester
England won by 8 wickets.
Canada 45 (40.3 ov); England 46-2 (13.5 ov).



Group B: India v New Zealand - June 13, 1979 at Leeds
New Zealand won by 8 wickets.
India 182 (55.5 ov); New Zealand 183-2 (57 ov).

Group B: Sri Lanka v West Indies - June 13, 1979 at The Oval
Match abandoned.

Group A: Australia v Canada - June 16, 1979 at Birmingham
Australia won by 7 wickets.
Canada 105 (33.2 ov); Australia 106-3 (26 ov).

Group A: England v Pakistan - June 16, 1979 at Leeds
England won by 14 runs.
England 165-9 (60 ov); Pakistan 151 (56 ov).

Group B: India v Sri Lanka - June 16, 1979 at Manchester
Sri Lanka won by 47 runs.
Sri Lanka 238-5 (60 ov); India 191 (54.1 ov).

Group B: New Zealand v West Indies - June 16, 1979 at Nottingham
West Indies won by 32 runs.
West Indies 244-7 (60 ov); New Zealand 212-9 (60 ov).

Semi-Final: England v New Zealand - June 20, 1979 at Manchester
England won by 9 runs.
England 221-8 (60 ov); New Zealand 212-9 (60 ov).



Semi-Final: Pakistan v West Indies - June 20, 1979 at The Oval
West Indies won by 43 runs.
West Indies 293-6 (60 ov); Pakistan 250 (56.2 ov).

Final: England v West Indies - June 23, 1979 at Lord's
West Indies won by 92 runs.
West Indies 286-9 (60 ov); England 194 (51 ov).

1996 Cricket World Cup win sri lanka

The 1996 Cricket World Cup (aka Wills World Cup) was won by Sri Lanka who beat Australia by 7 wickets at the final in Lahore.

The 1996 World Cup was played in India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. Controversy dogged the tournament before any games were played, however, when Australia and the West Indies refused to send their teams to Sri Lanka following the Central Bank Bombing by the Tamil Tigers in January, citing security concerns. Sri Lanka, in addition to offering maximum security to the teams, questioned the validity of citing security concerns when the International Cricket Council had determined it was safe. After extensive negotiations, the ICC ruled that Sri Lanka would be awarded both games on forfeit. As a result of this decision, Sri Lanka automatically qualified for the quarter-finals without having played a game.

Three teams made their World Cup debuts in 1996: the United Arab Emirates, the Netherlands and Kenya. The Netherlands lost each of their five matches while the U.A.E. only beat the Dutch. Kenya, however, recorded a surprise victory over the West Indies in Pune.

The Sri Lankans, coached by Dav Whatmore and captained by Arjuna Ranatunga, used Man of the Series Sanath Jayasuriya[1] and Romesh Kaluwitharana as opening batsmen to take advantage of the fielding restrictions during the first 15 overs of each innings. At a time when 50 or 60 runs in the first 15 overs was considered adequate, Sri Lanka scored 117 runs in those overs against India, 123 against Kenya, 121 against England in the quarter-final and 86 against India in the semi-final. Against Kenya, Sri Lanka made 398 for 5, a new record for the highest team score in a one-day international that stood until April 2006.

Sri Lanka won the first semi-final over India at Eden Gardens, Kolkata in front of a crowd unofficially estimated at 110 000. Chasing Sri Lanka's innings of 251 for 8, India had slumped to 120 for 8 in the 35th over when sections of crowd began to throw fruit and plastic bottles onto the field. The players left the field for 20 minutes in an attempt to quieten the crowd. When the players returned for play, more bottles were thrown onto the field and fires were lit in the stand. Match referee Clive Lloyd awarded the match to Sri Lanka, the first default ever in a Test or One Day International.

In the second semi-final in Mohali, Australia recovered from 15 for 4 to reach 207 for 8 from their 50 overs. The West Indians had reached 165 for 2 in the 42nd over before losing their last 8 wickets for 37 runs in 50 balls.

Sri Lanka won the toss in the final and sent Australia in to bat despite the team batting first having won all five previous World Cup finals. Mark Taylor top scored with 74 in Australia's total of 241 for 7. After Australia had put down no fewer than five catches, Sri Lanka won the match in the 47th over with Aravinda de Silva following his 3 for 42 with an unbeaten 107 to win the Player of the Match award. It was the first time a tournament host or co-host had won the cricket World Cup.



Australia crush India to win World Cup

593 runs were scored in what, after bowlers had ruled the roost till date, ended up as a batsman's final -- and despite that, defending champions Australia kept its grip on the World Cup by a whopping margin of 125.

The game was characterized by some spectacular batting -- but the really fascinating part of the final contest between a resurgent India and a rampant Australia was the tactical cut and thrusts, the moves and countermoves that this game was full of.

Australia made one change, omitting the all-rounder Ian Harvey and bringing in Damien Martyn into the number four slot. India, for its part, kept an unchanged line-up.

Ricky PontingRicky Ponting called wrong and Sourav Ganguly elected to bowl first. It is a decision that is going to come in for some analysis; ditto flak. At this same ground, on April 16, 2000, Australia had made 205 batting first, and lost to South Africa.

In 71 matches since then, Australia has never failed to defend any score in excess of 200; in that period, it has lost only 14 times and on 11 of those occasions, it lost chasing. Looked at another way, India, after its famous 1998 triumph in Sharjah chasing a big Australian score, had won only four of 15 encounters -- and on each occasion, India had batted first and put up scores of 307, 265, 315 and 279.

Precedent, thus, dictated that India's best chance lay in batting first -- but Ganguly had his own reasons. He pointed out that the pitch was moist, which it was -- thunderstorms late last evening and a bit of rain early this morning meant the covers were left on too long, the pitch had a few damp spots as a result (in fact, the ground staff attempted to blow-dry it ahead of start of play) and there were clouds overhead. All of this meant that there was something in it for seam bowlers -- and Ganguly backed his resurgent pace attack to exploit the conditions.

On balance, it was a good call from Ganguly -- you wouldn't want to blame the captain for the fact that his bowlers lost the plot.

First 15 overs: On such tracks, you want your bowlers to bowl line and length and let the pitch do the rest. It was doubly important to get off to a good start. Zaheer Khan, bowling the first over, however got excited and sprayed it around -- the first over, punctuated by wides and no balls, went for 15 runs; that set the tone for a first spell that produced 28 runs in 3 overs from Khan.

Srinath began with an over costing just two runs. Gilchrist seemed to decide that it was important to knock Srinath off his length as well -- and went after him with a vengeance, knocking him around for 16 runs in his 4th over.

Ashish Nehra and Harbhajan Singh were forced to come in earlier than Ganguly would have wanted to introduce them, to try and reduce the carnage. No matter -- the first 15 overs produced 107 runs, for the loss of one wicket.

It was a parade of spectacular strokes --- a superb off drive by Hayden off Khan in the first over, a smashing off drive by Gilchrist off the same bowler in the third, a pull by Gilchrist off Srinath in the fourth over, a superb square drive off Srinath and then an upper cut over point fours in the 6th over. All that was prelude to the 8th over, when Srinath went around the wicket and was square driven for four off the first ball, then pulled, twice -- the second ending up well over midwicket for six.

Nehra's introduction changed things around -- both Gilchrist and Hayden found themselves unable to pick the ball coming in to the left-hander from the one going away. Harbhajan, meanwhile, made the ball turn dramatically from ball one -- and Gilchrist, in some strife, attempted to swing his way out of trouble, mishit once, repeated the shot, and holed out with a second top-edged sweep to deep midwicket.

During this period, Australia carried out its gameplan to perfection, battering the Indian new ball attack and ensuring that it never managed to gain the upper hand. India, meanwhile, missed a bit of a bet: at Centurion, a similar opening by the Aussies had been checked momentarily with the introduction of spin; more to the point, Stephen Fleming had against the Aussies brought on Daniel Vettori as early as the fourth over and caused problems to the openers, who like the ball coming on to them and seem a bit uneasy against the turning ball.

16-30 overs: This was the only period in the first innings when India got a look in. There was the dismissal of Gilchrist; Hayden, clearly off form, was playing within himself and struggling to move up the gears; Ponting looked very ill at ease at the start of his innings, and Nehra and Harbhajan combined beautifully.

In the 19th over, Nehra (6-0-25-0, a beautiful spell of seam bowling in which he, unlike his colleagues, concentrated on the right length and line) went off and Srinath (4-0-33-0 in the first spell) came back on. In the very next over, Harbhajan Singh floated a ball just short of driving length, pushed Hayden back on the back foot, spun the ball from leg across the left hander, and took the edge for Dravid to hold.

That brought Martyn and Ponting together -- and Martyn, starting off with a back foot square drive off Srinath in the 21st over, hit his straps. Working the ball around beautifully, pulling and driving with precision, he took on himself the onus of scoring at speed. This allowed Ponting to steady his nerves and settle down to working the singles.

The 25th over brought up the 150 of the innings. Ganguly, meanwhile, began to face a few problems -- he needed to take Harbhajan off as the off spinner ran out of overs (7-0-35-2); Sehwag came on in his place and bowled a controlled line and length, going for a mere 14 in his three overs; he was replaced by Dinesh Mongia who did equally well. Tendulkar went for 20 in three, and was clearly rusty from not bowling, as he mixed good deliveries with full tosses -- surprisingly, Sehwag who bowled with great control and even caused a few problems to both batsmen, wasn't brought back as replacement.

Australia, without taking any chances, moved to 184/2 in 30 overs; the period also saw the 50 of the partnership off just 50 deliveries with Martyn being the engine (25 off 24 deliveries).

Overs 30-40: Ganguly needed to squeeze in his main bowlers somehow. He figured on bringing Zaheer Khan back in the 31st over -- and the move proved costly. Ponting and Martyn went after the bowler who was clearly off colour -- 13 came in the 33rd over and Khan had gone for 46 in his first five overs.

The 35th over saw Yuvraj Singh coming on -- and Martyn pulled to wide midwicket to bring up his 50 off just 48 deliveries; an innings of extraordinary quality as it allowed his captain to bide his time. The structure of the innings can be judged from the 19 dot balls and 18 singles, plus five twos, he had scored at that point besides the boundary hits.

India's faint chance, in the 38th over, came when Ponting, looking to swing Mongia over midwicket, missed and was hit on the pad in front of middle stump. The batsman had come down the track; on the other hand, the ball was clearly heading for middle stump, but umpire Bucknor turned the appeal down; the over also brought up the 100 of the partnership off 106 deliveries.

The 39th over was worth noting, as it signaled the passing of the baton from Martyn to Ponting. Till then, it was the former who did the scoring while Ponting played the percentages; Harbhajan came back on in the 39th and Ponting opened out. Off successive balls, he came down the wicket and deposited the off spinner high over wide midwicket -- a calculated assault that paid off big time as Ganguly took his off-spinner off at once (Singh never bowled again, and you had to say that was an oversight).

Australia, at the end of 40 overs, had 250/2 on the board.

Overs 41-50: This period was pure Ponting. In the 41st over, Nehra lost control of an attempted slower ball; Ponting swung the resultant full toss one handed over square leg. In the next over, Ponting went down the track and got under a Dinesh Mongia delivery, striking it superbly over long on fof another six. Zaheer Khan was brought back in the 44th over -- and Ponting promptly wound up and blasted him back down the track for four; Khan replied with a full toss and Ponting smashed him over long on for six.

Martyn produced a lovely shot in the 47th over when he stepped away and square drove Mongia for six, but the end overs were all Ponting -- it has been a long, long time since anyone ever drove the ball so well, so hard, and in so many different directions. Bowlers came and disappeared; others (Sehwag, Bajji, Singh) weren't tried. Zaheer Khan kept coming back on -- in the 44th over, which went for 12, in the 49th, which went for 13. Srinath, whose slower pace was meat and drink to batsmen in overdrive, went for 10, 12 and 18 in the 46th, 48th and 50th respectively and when the dust settled, Australia had posted a mammoth 359/2.

Interestingly, though Martyn was approaching his 100, Ponting refused to take his foot off the pedal. He was the one striking the ball harder, so he kept the strike; Martyn, too, took singles and let his captain have it rather than look for his own landmark.

Nehra alone among the seam bowlers came off with honors; Khan went big time each time he came on to bowl, Srinath had a disastrous last three overs. Harbhajan produced the star turn -- strangely, he was taken off after Ponting went after him in that one over, and never got the ball again.

Overall, the Australian batsmen held on to their nerve; the Indian seamers failed to locate their own. Ponting's innings encapsulated Australian cricket -- he was shaky at the start but hung in there grimly in the shadow of his partner; the Indians failed to press home that advantage thanks to over-excited bowling, and Ponting, once he found his feet, made them pay.

The statisticians will come up with the records -- first hundred by a captain after Clive Lloyd, in a Cup final; highest partnership, and so on. Never mind the figures -- it was, quite simply, magnificent.

The Indian chase: It was a huge, almost impossible, ask; it was made more complicated by looming thunderclouds. But then, India knew about the weather going in; the wicket remained good for batting. What was needed was a firm start.

Tendulkar took first strike, and the clear intention was to go after McGrath. In the first over, he pulled one savagely from outside off through the on side for four; then, as in the earlier meeting between the two sides, took to floating across his stumps. There was premeditation in the move -- Tendulkar clearly expected McGrath to bowl outside his off stump. The bowler, instead, made one bounce on middle; Tendulkar was too far to off as he went for the pull, found himself cramped, and put it in the air for McGrath to hold at short mid-on.

That brought Ganguly to the wicket -- and from the outset, he kept dancing down to McGrath, much to the latter's bemusement. In between, Sehwag flicked Lee off his pads for four, then repeated the shot in the 4th over and was caught by Martyn at square leg off a no ball.

In the fifth over, Ganguly top edged an attempted pull over Gilchrist for four, then stepped to leg to make room and carve McGrath over point for six. Sehwag in his turn upper cut the last ball of that over for six over point. Ganguly then looked to step to leg to hit Lee through the off and, after failing once, pulled it off in the sixth.

Sehwag drove a yorker length delivery from Lee in the eighth over, showing great footwork to make room; Ganguly in the next over went down the track to cover drive McGrath for four, and the 50 of the partnership came up off 47 deliveries.

It was desperate stuff -- and it came to an end in the 10th over as Ganguly, after three failed attempts to swing Lee to leg, finally landed the shot and hit it down the throat of mid on (57/2).

The next over produced more disaster -- Mohammad Kaif, without moving his feet, swung a drive at McGrath and edged to the keeper.

By now, a cloud burst threatened. Ponting, in an attempt to race through a few overs, brought on Brad Hogg and Darren Lehmann -- and Sehwag went into over drive. The 14th over saw Lehmann clubbed through the on side for three successive fours; the 15th saw him loft Hogg over cover for four, then hit even harder and further, over wide midwicket, for six.

Ponting promptly took Lehmann off and brought on Andy Bichel -- and Dravid joined the party, flicking off his hips for four through mdiwicket in the 16th over. The 17th over produced the 100 of the innings, off 106 balls -- the fact that India was going along at that pace despite the loss of three wickets indicating how good the track was to bat on, and how rank bad shots by Tendulkar, Ganguly and Kaif was costing the team. At the end of that over, the rains prompted the umpires to take the players off.

Play resumed after a hold up of around 20 minutes -- and Sehwag began to pile up the pressure on the Aussies. McGrath bowled the 19th, and went for 6 runs; Bichel bowled the 20th, and went for 7 including a superb short arm pull for four; Hogg bowled the 21st and Sehwag smashed him through midwicket for four; in the 23rd over, Hogg watched in bemusement as Sehwag went on his knee and swung a delivery from off over midwicket for six, then got under a delivery and elevated it over cover for four.

At the end of 23 overs, India had made it to 145/3; Australia, at that point, were 144/2 – the chase was on.

Ponting by then had problems -- McGrath had gone for runs; Lee had only four overs left; Bichel was being played with ease, Brad Hogg was being massacred. That meant three of four regular bowlers were proving costly; he couldn't even think of using his fifth bowler. A few more overs of this, and India would have been right back in the game.

Superb fielding -- and an unfortunate slip -- brought Australia back into the game. Sehwag drove firmly to mid off. Bichel slipped on his follow through, then got up again and spun around to see what was happening. Sehwag, meanwhile, was running with the shot; he found Bichel in his way and had to run around him. Lehmann at mid off attacked the ball, picked up, and hurled the stumps down in one fluent move, and Sehwag was gone -- and unfortunate end to a great knock.

At the 25 over mark, India had made 154/4; Yuvraj and Dravid tried to make a match of it by working singles and occasionally, managing the fours -- but the impetus Sehwag provided was clearly beyond the scope of these two batsmen, and Australia clawed back into the game.

It could still have turned interesting, though -- Ponting was clearly delaying his fifth bowling option; had the Indian batsmen bided their time, they would have faced a situation where non-regular bowlers would have to bowl nine full overs.

Pointing gambled by preferring to bowl out his third and fourth bowler, despite the fact that they were going for runs -- and the gamble paid off big time. In the 32nd over, Dravid under-edged a cut onto his stumps; a mode of dismissal he has perished too quite often; the shot ended a controlled, composed innings after coming to the wicket at a time of strife.

Mongia came to the wicket and in the 34th over, played two successive square drives off Bichel. But in the next over Yuvraj, who was clearly uncomfortable against Hogg who turns the ball both ways with equal felicity, swung out once too often. A similar shot earlier had seen Martyn dropping him at wide long on -- this time, Lee was the fielder there and he made absolutely no mistake to the steepling, swirling catch.

The situation here underlines what might have been, had the batsmen managed to hold their nerve. At the end of 35, Bichel and Hogg were both bowled out. McGrath's seven overs had proved costly. Lee alone had bowled with fire and control, but he only had four overs to go.

Of the remaining 15 overs, thus, fully nine had to be bowled by the combination of Lehmann and Symonds; India at 209 after 35 were, in terms of runs, close to Australia which had made 217 at the same point.

The situation was one the chasing team could have capitalized on – unfortunately, though, it had thrown away too many wickets by then.

Martyn hammered the last nail into the Indian coffin. Mongia looked to chip over Symonds' head in the 36th over; it was a well conceived and executed shot but it reckoned without Martyn who, from mid off, spun around, raced back and dived to hold the ball as it came from behind him, dropping over his right shoulder. The brilliant catch made up for his earlier lapse; more importantly it underlined why this team is so good – its fielding and catching make even the most ordinary bowling assume lethal dimensions.

With Mongia gone, Harbhajan and the rest of the tail folded with token resistance, and India succumbed by the margin of 125 runs.

India fought better, and harder, than it had in the first encounter between the two sides; but in the final analysis it made too many errors, both when bowling and batting -- and against a side like Australia, one mistake is all it takes.

Australia ended the tournament unbeaten, taking its winning streak to 17. More to the point, it emphasized that as a team, it plays its cricket in a different zone from the rest of the world.

Earlier in the competition, an Aussie fan held aloft a banner that read: No Waughs; No Warne; No Problems. Shortly thereafter, the side lost Gillespie as well.

You cannot think of any other contemporary side that could have suffered those setbacks and yet pulled through -- and that, more than anything else, underlines the amazing class, courage, of this all-conquering side.

Post Script: It has been fun, bringing you the match reports, Panix Station and columns; fun (well, for the most part) to get feedback, much of which taught me things I needed to know. It is over now -- and after three successive Cups and six straight years of reporting on every game India played, I get a chance to move on to other things (though I guess I'll still contribute the occasional column). On my way out this particular door, thank you all for reading.

Thursday, September 4, 2008

Champions Trophy postponed till 2009


The eight-nation Champions Trophy tournament has been officially postponed until October next year amidst serious security concerns in Pakistan, the host of the tournament, at present time.

While many of the Australian players have expressed their concerns for travelling to Pakistan and had been blamed for potentially jeopardising the tournament, it was actually the South African cricket board that drew first blood by refusing to send their team. Other countries considering pull-outs over security worries were Australia, New Zealand and England.


Therefore, the International Cricket Council (ICC) was forced to put off the eight-nation biennial tournament - due to start on September 12 - until October 2009. However, Pakistan has kept the hosting rights.

Pakistan cricket officials also expressed how they 'felt let down' by Australia, South Africa and non-Asian teams after their security fears led to the postponement until 2009.

Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) chief operating officer Shafqat Naghmi said: "We are definitely disappointed by Australia because they have not toured us for 10 years."

Can the Pakistan Cricket Board really 'feel let down' by Australia for the postponement of the tournament? Despite looking likely that Cricket Australia would withdraw players like their South African counterparts, things were yet still to be confirmed. Cricket Australia has the responsibility to look after their players and if, in any way, the safety of the players maybe jeopardised on tour, then they have to act, which they have done or would have done in this case.

World Cup Score

World Cup Score To Keep You Constantly Connected With The Game!

World Cup 2007 is just round the corner and all cricket fans can think of is how to be in constant touch with the latest world cup score of all the matches. World cup is one cricketing event that every cricket fan looks forward to. Once every four years during the cricket world cup, fans put a hold to all their schedules just to be able to catch up with live and latest updated world cup score. Australia had won the last two world cup and they will for sure want to score a hatrick by winning it in 2007 as well. So need one say that this is going to be a very competitive world cup?

Making prior arrangements is good if you want to be in touch with all the matches that will be played during the world cup. These days, time constraint is a common factor for all people and this makes it difficult for cricket fans to catch up with all the ongoing action in a tournament. But thanks to technology that keeping track of any tournament has become very easy these days, no matter in which corner of the world the event is taking place. So when your team will sweat it out in the West Indies in 2007, you will be well aware of what is happening there.

The internet has revolutionized the way we see and come to know about events. So simply by sitting in the comfort of your bedroom, you can easily know the latest that is happening anywhere in the world as far as the cricket field is concerned. There are several online sites which work dedicatedly towards providing information about world cup score and all other information related to the event. In fact, such websites can become a one stop source for all world cup cricket related information.

That is not all, most of these online sites run several games where visitors can participate and win great prizes. So it is a great way for cricket fans to keep their cricket knowledge updated and also win great prizes. Records about all the past world cup events can be found in these sites. Well it is very much possible that fans know who the higher century maker is and who is the highest wicket taker in the world, but how many of us actually know who the highest run scorer in the world cup is. So all these sites have information on everything you want to know about the world cup.

In this World Cup, sixteen teams will be vying for the title and there is bound to be some great matches there. We will all have to wait and see what action unfolds in the ground and who actually goes about winning the tournament this time. Being informed about the world cup will surely help fans in understanding the game much better. After all, we would all love to know what things will be at stake when our favorite teams and players take the field in World Cup 2007 in the West Indies.